Hamlet cannot love, Hamlet hates women, Hamlet believes the world is a prison and “there is nothing good nor bad but thinking makes it so”.
Hipster nihilism of the literary sort began with Hamlet (Little Bacon!) the homosexual, demon-possessed serial killer who destroys Denmark and hands the reins of the kingdom to Fortinbras, which means “Strong-arm”. Remind you of anyone?
“The more I read and watch the play, and the more I read about it, the more unsettling and anxiety producing it becomes. This inculcating of anxiety must be intentional. For instance, Stephen Booth, an expert on the Shakespeare sonnets, in his 1969 essay “on the value of Hamlet” states “the play persists in taking its audience to the brink of intellectual terror”. Yet, there is a hypnotic quality under all the bombastic violence and the shocking ending. The Bard always balances it out. The antithesis, the language, and emphasis on death and suicide are particularly transfixing, and in a similar way as does the poetry of The Tempest, which also has a ridiculous plot, the poetry creates a glue that holds a problematic plot and problematic characterization together.”
Rather than a full scale critique of Hamlet, I'll concentrate mostly on the Hamlet that has unmistakable Gnostic overtones, though I can't resist making many other side comments. Despite spending the last few months reading many interpretations of the play, I have not found anything yet that discusses the obvious Gnosticism of The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince Of Denmark.
Eleanore Prosser proves Hamlet Was Possessed Of A Demon
The Gnostic subtext of The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince Of Denmark becomes clear via a deep reading. Hamlet hates the world, yet believes he should be king. How Gnostic. Eleanor Prosser groundbreaking 1977 book reveals in a step by step fashion examining Elizabethan texts and plays that Hamlet’s Ghost was actually a demon. Hamlet was possessed.
Critics and readers repeatedly vote for Hamlet as the greatest play ever written. How many are aware of Hamlet’s meaning in the depiction of a chaos agent who murders his best friends and the heads of State, paving the way for a foreign invasion, while blessing the new ruler Fortinbras with his ‘dying voice’? Sweet Prince my ass.
Why would Shakespeare want to depict a chaos agent? I think it is an illustration of a a technique to be employed in the expansion of Empire? As the Freemasons say “Order Ab Chao”. If that angle sounds like a play that Empire-obsessed Francis Bacon would write, that’s because Francis Bacon did write it. See: THE OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE: Francis Bacon Was Shakespeare. Bacon created The Shakespeare Hoax as head of a group of writers as a project of early British Intelligence. Shakespeare was designed to create Empire.
Harold Bloom, America’s leading literary critic actually believed that Shakespeare invented what it means to be human. Harold Bloom worshipped Shakespeare exactly as Bacon designed Shakespeare to be worshipped. Harold Bloom was a Gnostic too. What a coincidence.
Hamlet was a homosexual demon-possessed chaos agent who despised women and destroys the State. All for Empire. Have a listen. Remind you of anyone?
