Why I Believe Virus Exist and WHY Virus Deniers Are Actually Religious Fundamentalists
Even Though I Totally Mistrust The Motives Of Big Science
Why Evidence Supports That Virus Exist and WHY Virus Deniers Are Actually Religious Fundamentalists (at best)—Even Though I Totally Mistrust The Motives Of Big Science.
PART 1 DEFINING TERMS
The claim from Tom Cowan, the Baileys, Kaufmann, Mike Yeadon, Tim West and all of the rest:
“There has never been any infectious disease or pathogen at any point in history”
“Virus is a complete figment of the imagination. Virus does not exist”
I’m writing this because the “no-virus’ crowd (Cowan, Bailey, Kaufmann etc etc) has prominently stated that there is no such thing as a virus. They are increasingly gaining traction and creating a divisive element in the health freedom movement, a freedom movement that is trying to end mandatory vaccination and expose the evil of the Covid fraud.
The No-virus crowd is now mocking the vaccine safety activists who are campaigning for medical health freedom by calling them “gatekeepers” who are “reinforcing the illusion that there is such thing as a virus”, thus serving the dark interests of Kontrol. They even impugn the ‘gatekeepers’ morals and character by claiming that these gatekeepers must know that there is no virus, yet refuse to admit it! By impugning the character of others who do not share theie same faith in the non-existence of the virus they are in fact demonstrating a nasty religious fundamentalism common to all members of the cult of Scientism-or of any religion.
And that’s my main problem with the Mike Yeadon, Cowan, Bailey et al’s insistence that there is NO SUCH THING AS AN INFECTIOUS DISEASE. NO SUCH THING! Cowan: “There is no such thing as contagion”. This is an unprovable faith-based assertion. You cannot prove that there is no such thing as contagion. You cannot prove that there is no such thing as a virus. Ironically this ‘no virus’ crowd thinks they are speaking in the language of science. It’s hilarious and preposterous. It’s pure sensationalistic click baitery. It’s pure sophistry. Absolute certainty is NOT and never is real Science.
Then, to top it off, they all refuse to accept any evidence that contradicts their assertions. The evidence is never given to them in just the right form, or in just the right way. One way they reject evidence of virus is by claiming that no virus sample has ever been ‘purified’. Yet thousands of scientists claim they have purified virus samples and they show evidence for it.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/immunology-and-microbiology/virus-purification
So it’s “he said, she said”, which is a very weak argument, but sophists are excellent at spinning minor differences into major problems when speaking to the vulnerable. In this the the traumatized, the general public that still has a healthy curiosity despite having been bludgeoened by lies.
The no-virus sophists amplify the quality evidence that they do have—that science cannot “prove” contagion! I totally agree that this is quite fascinating: no experiement has shown an infectious disease was transmitted under laboratory conditions! Thsi howeveer is not proof that contagions does not exist. We all know we have ‘caught’ a disease from someone. We all know contagion exists! But it odesn’t laways happen in the same way. Yes indeed…contagion is a mystery!
Science can’t prove the reality of the soul. I know the soul exists but science can’t “prove” it. Science can’t prove telepathy but I’ve experienced it many times. Science has no idea how life on earth began. science has no idea how a thought is stored in the brain, or how a thought can even exist in a physical workd. But life is here and thought is real. Science is puzzled.
Like everything else about life, even if Science claims to “prove’ or ‘understand’it or can model it, it’s existence is still mystery. But not to the NO-VIRUS loudmouths. They are absolutely certain contagion and virus and pathogens DO NOT exist! So…mystery solved.
What is real is that the DANGER of virus is way overhyped by the profit mechanism built in to contemporary Science. Virus is not a dangerous thing in and of itself. Vaccines are completely unnecesary. But Big-Profit Science scare us with virus with lies. That’s the real issue that the no-virus crowd is avoiding and clouding by denying that virus even exists.
TOO BIG A HOAX
Faking the existence of a virus is way too big a hoax to pull off. You’d need thousands of people continually pretending to work with virus for a hundred years now, pretending to do actual work that they are not doing. It wouldn’t work, it can’t work as a hoax. It would have to have way to many moving parts. It would be exposed too easily. That’s not how hoaxes work.
Cowan is essentially saying there are thousands of scientists in thousands of labs all over the world pretendng to work with Virus. Really? All of them are phony? All of them a continual hoax, working with a substance that does not exist? All of them pretending? Really? I don’t think that is even remotely possible.
Unlike the moon landing hoax, which was one hoax repeated 7 times, all that hoax needed was actors staging the event, fiming the fake event and for it to continue all it needed was control of the media, to prevent open discussion of evidence of the hoax, because so many were fooled by the initial hoax, as it was very well done. They did not continue to fake putting a man on the moon. Even though there is so much evidence that it is impossible to put a man on the moon, and so much evidence that it never actually happened, many still believe we went.
The same with the Shakespeare hoax, the mother of all hoaxes which even led to the Science hoaxes. You only needed a hundred or so people to pull it off and then it continues on it’s own because everyone was fooled intitally by the quality of the hoax and the censorship of anyone speaking against the hoax. They did not continue to write new Shakepseare plays. The hoax continues because it is easier to fool someone than convince someone they have been fooled.
Wikipedia: “Viruses are found in almost every ecosystem on Earth and are the most numerous type of biological entity.” Cowan et al: “There is no such thing as a virus.
This gap between being the most numerous thing on the planet to they do not exist is too large!
Labs that work with virus number in the tens of thousands worldwide.
Laboratories that work with virus are designated by Bio Safety level 1-4. BSL-4 was Wuhan Lab where Cowan says they pretended to do gain of function with the most highly virulent viruses. There are some 60+ BSL-4 labs in the USA.
There are hundreds of BSL-3 labs in the US. According to this paper: “We identified 3515 BSL-3 laboratories in 149 countries, with nearly half (47.1%) in the United States. Details on geolocations and pathogens they handled are publicly available for 955 of these labs.”
There is no precise global census of BSL-2 laboratories, because they are vastly more numerous than BSL-3 or BSL-4 labs, likely numbering in the tens of thousands worldwide. BSL-2 labs are the standard workhorses of global biology, found in nearly every hospital, university, and diagnostic center. They handle moderate-risk pathogens like HIV, Salmonella, and influenza for routine diagnostics and research.
All these labs are fake? All of them pretending ot work with something that does not exist?
To pull of a hoax of no-virus then you’d need to continually be staging the same hoax over and over again, every day thousands of time. It’s too big a hoax! Cowan is the hoax!
They have electron microscopy images of virus. Nope- not good enough for the no-virus crowd.
Cowan et al are 100 percent certain no such thing as a virus exists and they say it with such conviction and seeming righteousness of truth telling that many are fooled. This is classic sophistry or, sophisticated lying. Absolute certainty is impossible in this situation. You cannot prove that “There has never been any infectious disease or pathogen at any point in history”. This is an article of faith, plain and simple. The evidence for virus is beyond dispute. How they really work and why human disease cannot be pinned down experimentally is up for grabs. There is plenty of grey area to explore.
I think this sophistry is spreading because we have all been told so many lies- from the assassination of JFK to what happened on 9-11 to the origin of all the recent wars to the fake virus virulence and global shutdown from Covid-19 that served to make the wealthy and powerful more wealthy and powerful. All for our own good of course. These lies are immense and they just keep on coming. So many lies! So the logic of the traumatized goes: “well then they must be lying about the actual existence of a thing called virus! Listen to Cowan’s sophistry long enough and you will buy it even though there is enormous and overwheming evidence that virus exists. The traumatized are easily hypnotized and monetized. Who funds Cowan?
What is real is that there is no evidence that we need vaccines to combat the virus. We do not need to fear the virus!
What the loudmouth no-contagion no-virus crowd is doing is serving the lies of Big Science by diluting the health freedom movement. The real issue here is the massive profit-generating, populace-weakening lie that vaccines are necessary to fight virus or bacteria. This is a tremendous and evil lie that we all must confront. The human immune system is as miraculous as the human brain. No vaccines needed. This is the message that the public needs to fully absorb and believe, the public needs to STOP trusting Science, science is NOT TRUTH, and instead they get sophisticated liars and showmen like Cowan and Bailey. Sad.
PART 2 I Briefly Introduce Myself
I’m a researcher focusing on the way modern science was created (by Francis Bacon and his Freemasons) to control humanity, and that evil intent hides behind the remarkable creature comforts science has created for us. I’m certainly not implicating all scientists in this nefarious scheme. There is plenty of good science.
I am a trained clinical herbalist who has treated many people with natural medicine. I would never recommend a vaccine.
I believe science has become the biggest religion on the planet witnessed by the more than 5 billion people who took the toxic experimental gene therapy during the Covid Plandemic in one of the most horrifying mass crimes ever committed. Most people took the vaccine because they believe in science as an institution that represents truth. I do not believe Science represents truth, only at times a partial truth.
Science is a fundamental aspect of human existence and has always been with us in various forms like building and hunting and cooking and in the mathematics and philosophy of the ancient world. Modern science, based on laboratory experiment and the search for the secrets of nature, emerging from magick and alchemy has produced marvels but has also warped belief to such an extent that many think Science is man’s greatest accomplishment. So much so that they would submit to allowing a government to mandate putting toxic products into themselves and their children to attend school.
Science can be good or evil and men can be good or evil, including scientists. How does one fight evil? With the true, the good and the beautiful.
The truth is often very elusive. Truth is variable. Truth changes. But a lie is always a lie.
We are all trying to expose and end an epidemic of lies, especially the lies that pretend to be Science. The enemy, the occult elite media, banking, entertainment, the war monger, big pharma wing of human society has perfected the science of lies.
Next up: Why the Earth is definitely not flat 🙄
Mr. Frederick is really good at some things, but he is not reasoning well here. And he is misrepresenting the no virus people he names to a shocking degree. Mr. Cowan is the one person out of the crowd who does too often speculate freely and at times to an implausible degree. But everyone else there are precise thinkers and do not state their case in a sloppy manner. They all understand that the true state of the case is that viruses have not been proven to exist. If any of them takes the liberty of actually letting slip that viruses don't exist, it is only in the colloquial sense that one means this when one has exposed a sham. It is a truism that nothing can be proven to not exist, strictly speaking.
Mr. Frederick is lacking in objective analysis here. His arguments are almost entirely rule-of-thumb. Has he ever analyzed one of the foundational experiments that established how viruses actually get "isolated?" He's very good at literary analysis and finding openings for possible interpretation in literary texts, which is why I pay attention to his substack. But he's out of his depth here, it seems, in debunking what these no virus figures have properly exposed. Whether viruses exist or not, and what the methods are that are claimed for having discovered them, is an entirely objective, quantifiable process, entirely subject to strict logical and methodological analysis. So much so, that it doesn't really matter what Mr. Frederick thinks about the scale of the hoax, or whether any one of us thinks it's not possible to create one the size of the virus hoax. The fact that no virus has ever been satisfactorily proven to exist, yet alone cause illness, shifts the burden onto us instead to broaden our speculation on how the hoax at its scale is in fact possible.
Also, Mr. Frederick exaggerates the nature of the criticism these no virus figures direct at other members of the health freedom movement who retain their belief in viruses. They do not unreasonably, or like religious zealots, criticize those who hold the conventional view. They do not descend to ad hominem attacks, nor claim that all public figures retaining the conventional belief are in on the hoax. They do speculate that some of them might act as gatekeepers who are in the know that viruses have not been proven to exist. Even so, they do not attribute ill intention to all of these potential gatekeepers, often conceding that some of them do not profess what they know to be the case in order to avoid controversy and thus retain relevance and credibility among their audiences. I see nothing wrong with that tactic, that one would say one thing in public while privately adhering to a more controversial position. And the virus deniers are not trying to tell me that I'm bad because I think this is ok, though they do express their disagreement that such a tactic is the wisest course of action. So, the polemics that do take place are much more nuanced than Mr. Frederick is portraying them. All the virus deniers I know of seek to make common cause with anyone who prefers to emphasize raising the standards of freedom and informed consent. But there's nothing wrong with making the no virus claim that exposing the entire paradigm of virology as a hoax would solve many other related problems of health freedom in one fell swoop. That is a valid argument, as long as its underlying claim about no proof of viruses is true. If indeed viruses have never been proven to exist, that exposure would solve an array of other problems of medical tyranny pretty fast. And if you believe that viruses are a contrived fiction, how could you not feel the desire to take that straightest of pathways to all of the implications of that realization? I believe the best strategy is to have some trusted mainstream public figures playing it cautiously, and others laying out the full dimensions of the fraud according to the complete evidentiary record for those audiences who seem more willing or able to critically assess such arguments.
What is more, each one of these virus deniers Mr. Frederick names do believe there is partial evidence for contagion of some sort or other, though they all agree that how the contagion works - that we all to some degree observe - is a long way from having been conclusively demonstrated, yet alone explained. Terrain Theorists remain very open to other theories of causation for contagion, particularly models of resonance that resemble how laughing or affective moods, coughing or yawning, and menstrual cycles also appear to be contagious. It may very well be that when a body expresses symptoms of illness or detoxification, it signals this to other bodies who may respond similarly if they are also on some threshold of requiring detoxification or healing of some sort. Terrain Theorists generally interpret the symptoms of illness as the process of healing from the illness, not the direct manifestation of the illness itself. But even so, a lot of illness that might appear to originate as contagion can be hypothesized as - and may very well be due to - environmental exposures experienced in common. Causation is a tricky thing, sometimes even to a mind-bending degree, or in a way that pushes the limits of observation. So it is crucial to remain skeptical about what might seem obvious, and open to how uncannilly nuanced causation not infrequently turns out to be. Indeed, it is the very nuance and complexity of microbes and their causative role in tissue decomposition, that supply the vulnerability to manipulation required to pass off a medical scam at a scale that Mr. Frederick cannot yet wrap his mind around.
I have spent a tremendous amount of time listening to and reading every no virus name Mr. Frederick mentions, and I can say that he is wrong in how he is characterizing them, both in his portrayal of their arguments on the question of the existence of viruses, as well as of the nature of their critical rhetoric of others who maintain the conventional virus paradigm. This article serves rather more to showcase, unwittingly, some limits of Mr. Frederick's own reasoning capacities and his ability to fairly portray how other people frame and articulate their own arguments. I totally give him the benefit of the doubt, so I think his failure to portray these no virus figures accurately is due to not having considered closely enough the arguments they make. I do not at all say that he is a poor observer or intentionally distorting anything. Because he clearly understands other grand hoaxes like the moon landings, I'm sure there's plenty of hope for him to still come around to the virus hoax. But he has his niche, and his interests and talents are more literary, so maybe there's a limitation in that, but I hope not.
For anyone wishing to read something put out by one of these virus deniers, in this case Mr. Mark Bailey, here is the link to his most exhaustive presentation against the establishment of the existence of viruses and their pathogenicity:
https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition
I ran into Imani Oxam (Gaia TV) at an event in early 2023. A friend introduced us and she took a step back. She clearly knew who I was, probably because I refused to go along with the military health database psyop. Her best friend was the organizing lawyer, Scientologist Leigh Dundas.
I think she was momentarily mind boggled because she admitted to me organizing the No Virus group on message in 2020.
Huh.
Not long after, Jerm warfare guy attacks me in a chat group, out of nowhere, with a profanity laced tired, even attacking my wife, a biochemist who studies P53 cancer pathway, but sometimes viruses (basic work, not BSL4 or anything dedicated). But I was able to corner him. He claimed a guest of his was a biologist who did not believe in viruses. I listened to his podcast interview, but that isn't what the Ga Tech guy said. He just doubted the HIV theory. We connected by email, so I put the question to him directly. He did not respond.
Yeah, these people are playing a game to draw in people they can dupe and farm. Some of the shady MFM groups have investment cults with mediums who channel stock picks. Yes, really. That's the Arlington Institute crowd from what I hear.